A recent Investigator Magazine article alleging that Malawi President Lazarus Chakwera is dictator shielding corruption and suppresses critics, is not only misleading but also lacks a comprehensive understanding of governance dynamics.
Chakwera, since assuming office, has placed great emphasis on ensuring the independence of agencies, a fundamental aspect of any democratic society. These include the Anti-Corruption Bureau.
One of the key principles of Chakwera’s administration is the autonomy of each government department and institution. He has consistently emphasized the importance of these entities operating independently, free from any form of interference or influence.
This commitment to institutional independence is a cornerstone of democracy, ensuring that all branches of government can fulfill their mandate without fear or favor.
Contrary to the claims made about protecting corrupt individuals, Chakwera has demonstrated a strong stance against corruption. His government has taken decisive action against individuals implicated in corrupt practices, regardless of their status or affiliations.
The arrest and prosecution of prominent individuals facing corruption charges, including Vice President Saulos Chilima, cabinet ministers and his advisors, serve as examples of this commitment to accountability and transparency.
Regarding the alleged crackdown on critics and journalists, it is crucial to distinguish between fact and fiction. While freedom of the press is a fundamental right that must be safeguarded, upholding the rule of law is equally important.
Journalists are not exempted from the law, and their actions must be guided by ethical standards and respect for the truth.
The recent arrest of MacMillan Mhone, a journalist with Nation Publications Ltd, on charges of conduct “likely to cause public alarm,” should be considered within this context.
The government bears the responsibility of investigating and addressing potential threats to public safety, as was the case with the story published online.
Furthermore, the claim that Chakwera has targeted activists and journalists for criticizing his regime is baseless.
While robust debate and criticism are essential in a democracy, they must be grounded in facts and conducted within the boundaries of the law. The arrest of individuals, should be viewed as part of the efforts to uphold the rule of law and combating impunity.
Portraying Chakwera as a dictator is not only inaccurate but also undermines the progress being made in Malawi under his leadership. His commitment to democracy, transparency, and accountability should be commended rather than criticized.
It is crucial to base judgments on facts and to avoid spreading misinformation that can harm the reputation of individuals and institutions. This, the Investigator, which is run by a once-upon-a-time journalist, should know this better.
